Miscellaneous Antiques

You are currently browsing the archive for the Miscellaneous Antiques category.

Victorian mourning earrings & brooch with hair under glass

Victorian mourning earrings & brooch with hair under glass

Memorial Day may have only been a federal holiday since 1967, but the practice had already been a common one for about 100 years at that point.  Tending graves had always been a deeply-respected family tradition for many families, and this began to spread to a community level after the end of the American Civil War.  Memorializing the deaths of loved ones though is an age-old tradition, and you’ll find a wide variety of examples of the ways people have done this throughout history.

Some memorials are difficult or even distasteful to us today, like postmortem daguerreotypes. It’s hard for us to imagine today, with folders, both physical and virtual, full of photographs of our loved ones, but at the time, especially with a young child, the only way to keep an image of a loved one might have been to take an image of him or her after death. In some sad instances, you’ll even see daguerreotypes of children clearly on their deathbeds, with parents taking advantage of what might be the final opportunity to capture an image of their living child.

Many people also channeled their grief into making memorials. Throughout the late 18th and 19th centuries (especially during the reign of Queen Victoria, whose mourning of her husband, Prince Albert, took the rituals of grief to a whole new level), we routinely see mourning memorials made in a variety of crafts. You’ll find elaborate needlework embroideries and watercolors of traditional scenes (most commonly one or two women dressed in mourning near a tomb surrounded by weeping willows – the women here have real hair embroidered for theirs) and extraordinarily delicate examples of hair art, often encased in jewelry like the set pictured above. As the 19th century wore on, the desire and demand for mourning ephemera even lead the ubiquitous Currier & Ives to create prints that consumers could purchase, fill in with their loved one’s information and frame, even going so far as to create partially printed Civil War memorials to be filled out with the names of all members in a regiment.

But memorials weren’t just made for members of one’s immediate family. People also created memorials for historical figures, like John Paul Jones and Zebulon Pike; especially with the deaths of Washington and Lincoln, when the entire nation was in mourning, the marketing machine kicked into overdrive, with the names and images of the dead appearing on everything from rings to ribbons, pins to porcelain. Death never takes a holiday, and apparently, neither does the desire to memorialize those who pass on.

-Hollie Davis, Senior Editor, p4A.com

Confederate General Stonewall Jackson's Civil War mess kit

Confederate General Stonewall Jackson's Civil War mess kit - fake?

Some of the things antique collectors worry about most are fakes and forgeries, and with good reason – they’re all over the place!  Forgeries – altered documents, forged signatures and fake documents – are probably the most common, but fakes – recast objects and fake paintings and decorative objects – are becoming more “popular,” especially in the area of Asian carvings and porcelain, where labor is cheap and the materials and techniques have not changed greatly over millenia.

Aside from a fake made by creating an entirely new object, the kind of thing done when someone buys an old factory mold and starts recasting an object long out of production, many fakes are just the result of careful “additions.”  In some cases, it’s simply a matter of the judicious addition of a fake stamp, as is alleged to have happened with this Gorham silver piece that someone tried to make over as Faberge.  Another example is this old padlock, allegedly from the Winchester Firearms Factory.  Most likely, this was simply an old padlock with a plaque added, and fear that a similar technique had been used kept the mess kit pictured above, purportedly owned by famed Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, from selling.  Proof of provenance can ease fears, but with document forgery as easy and commonplace as it is, some concerns can never been resolved.

Fortunately, with many forgeries, historians and scholars have had decades to develop methods of identifying them.  Even more interesting, in a few cases, forgeries have been skillful enough or extensive enough or just bizarre enough to acquire value in their own right.  Forgers like Robert Spring, who specialized in historical figures like George Washington and Stonewall Jackson, and Eugene Field II, who came to forgery by faking inscriptions in his father’s library of books, would probably find it ironic that their efforts are now clearly identified and collected as forgeries.  (You can read more about Spring and Field in our reference notes.)  Sadly, forgers like Mark Hofmann have been hard at work in the 20th century, and with the full extent of their crimes as yet unknown, the historic documents market can be a tricky place for beginners.

Not every fake was intended to deceive.  Often, at some point in an object’s history, quality reproductions were offered, and the reproduction part of the story got lost somewhere along the way.  This is especially common with paintings and works on paper that were easily reproduced with high-quality mechanical processes and sold at one time to tourists as exactly what they were.  One hundred years later, someone’s just lost that part of the family story.  Usually, some careful research and a few conversations with experts can clarify any questions, so as always, know exactly who you’re buying from and exactly what you’re buying!

-Hollie Davis, Senior Editor, p4A.com

Newer entries »